i use my PC for machine learning experiments and some gaming, work by day, games at night. NVIDIA offers different driver branches: a gaming-focused one with frequent releases and a more conservative one aimed at creators. the Graphics Driver 310.19 for FreeBSD Im on now is teh gaming one. should i switch? what do i lose and gain? i would appreciate hearing from people who switched in either direction and why. im about to throw this thing out the window lol
Studio Vs Game Ready: Which NVIDIA Driver Branch For Machine Learning Experiments?
Accepted solution
Jump to the replybroadly: gaming branches ship faster with optimizations for new releases. studio/stable branches ship less often and focus on validation with creative apps. both run games and apps fine. the difference is cadence and test focus, not capability. hope that helps :)
broadly: gaming branches ship faster with optimizations for new releases. studio/stable branches ship less often and focus on validation with creative apps. both run games and apps fine. the difference is cadence and test focus, not capability. hope that helps :)
@mayaa206 Staying on teh gaming branch since Ive had no problems, but now I know switching is easy if I ever need to. Thanks! seriously made my day 馃槶馃檹
tried an older package for catalyst display driver 12.9 beta and got the same compatibility error
Related topics
- I Do Work Only. Which Branch Of GeForce Graphics Driver Makes Sense?
- Switching From Game Ready To Studio Drivers: Worth The Hassle?
- I Do Work By Day, Games At Night. Which Branch Of GeForce Graphics Driver Makes Sense?
- STUDIO VS GAME READY: WHICH NVIDIA DRIVER BRANCH FOR PHOTO EDITING?
- I do mostly gaming. Which branch of GeForce Quadro Graphics Driver 319.32 Beta makes sense?
- has anyone actually noticed a difference between driver branches for 3d modeling??
Reply to this topic
Sign in or create an account to reply.