Every hosting comparison I find is either an affiliate list or someones ten-year-old opinion. So Im asking real people: is a PaaS with git deploys a reasonable choice for a client site with modest traffic? What breaks first, what costs more than expected, and what would u never do again? Im comfortable with some technical work but I dont want hosting to become a second job. Id also love to hear what you wish someone had told you before you picked. im about to throw this thing out the window lol
THE HIDDEN COST OF A PAAS WITH GIT DEPLOYS NOBODY MENTIONS (ASKING FOR A CLIENT SITE WITH MODEST TRAFFIC)
ok so i can handle basic Linux, but Id rather not be the only person who can fix a client site with modest traffic at night. idk what else to say tbh
been there man whatever you choose, test restores, not just backups. Plenty of hosts advertise daily backups; far fewer customers have ever tried restoring one. Do a restore to a satging site once and youll know whether the backup story is real.
hmmmm ok spent half the night on hosting and im still not done. +1 same here what am i doing wrong??
@lucky_nomad387 wowww ok decided to stay where we are for now and fix our backup process first. Turns out that was the real worry, not teh host.
Reply to this topic
Sign in or create an account to reply.