genuine question: after a new motherboard, do you install the chipset driver package first? my home-built PC runs fine with Windows defaults. the ASRock support page has FM2A85X Extreme4 Bios 1.60. if I install it, what chagnes? if I dont, what am I missing? id love to hear opinions from people whove tried both. im not chasing benchmark records, I just want a properly set up system that wont surprise me later. im about to throw this thing out the window lol
FM2A85X Extreme4 Bios 1.60 Or Whatever Windows Picks? Lets Discuss (pls help)
sorry forgot to say the home-built PC is a fairly recent platform.
ok so on many platforms, teh chipest package is mostly INF files that give devices proper names and correct power settings. windows often provides equivalent inbox drivers. but some platforms include real drivers (power management, PCIe, i/O) that do matter.
oof check Device Manager with View > Show hidden devices. if there are unknown devices like SM Bus Controller or PCI Device, teh chipset package or related drivers fill those in. hope that helps :)
@ping_forge omggg decided to install the board maker's chipset package. It's now part of my checklist after a new motherboard. thank u thank u thank u
CATALYST DISPLAY DRIVER 7.11 REFUSES TO INSTALL ON MY HOME-BUILT TOWER. BUT THE PAGE SAYS IT SUPPORTS MY OS!
Related topics
- Do I Actually Need ASRock P45R2000-WiFi Bios 1.70 For DOS After A Clean Windows Install??
- windows update installed everything. should i still install p45r2000 bios?
- Windows Update Installed Everything. Should I Still Install X79 Extreme9 Bios?
- windows update installed everything. should i still install p45r2000 bios 1.50 for dos?
- Chipset Driver From The Board Maker Or From ASRock? Which One First??
- WHAT DOES A CHIPSET DRIVER EVEN DO ON A MODERN PREBUILT DESKTOP?? ugh
Reply to this topic
Sign in or create an account to reply.