ok weird one i use my PC for 3D modeling and some gaming, half and half. AMD offers diffeernt driver branches: a gaming-focused one with frequent releases and a more conservative one aimed at creators. The Catalyst Radeon 6.7 (Windows XP/2000/Media Center) i'm on now is the gaming one. Should i switch? What do i lose and gain? i would appreciate hearing from people who switched in either direction and why.
I Do Half And Half. Which Branch Of Catalyst Radeon 6.7 (Windows XP/2000/Media Center) Makes Sense?
wait what studio drivers arent magic, if an app has a bug with your GPU, both branches may have it, and the fix might arrive in teh gaming branch first. but hey ymmv
ok but is catalyst even worth bothering with or should i just leave it. try turning off the power plan first, fixed it for me ??
second monitor flickers black since intel aopen wt19p-ta intel extreme graphics driver r14.32.4.4926_pv
Related topics
- IS THE "STABLE" AMD BRANCH REALLY MORE STABLE, OR JUST SLOWER? 馃
- mostly gaming on one pc: one driver branch to rule them all?
- studio vs game ready: which amd driver branch for streaming and gaming?
- Do creative apps actually care which AMD driver branch I install?? 馃
- i do mostly gaming. which branch of mobility catalyst display driver makes sense??
- Has Anyone Actually Noticed A Difference Between Driver Branches For Machine Learning Experiments?
Reply to this topic
Sign in or create an account to reply.